When customers get behind on their debit or credit payments their account becomes delinquent until they set up a payment plan.
TD customers who are struggling to manage payments on their delinquent accounts.
How can the number of customer service calls be reduced for customers with delinquent accounts?
Allow customers to self-serve their accounts through the Payment Assistance Portal to set up a payment plan.
Users are prompted with simple questions that mirrors the way a customer service representative gathers information on a call.
Depending on the user’s answers and eligibility there next steps appear below until they have set up a payment plan.
Once the user selects their credit account, they are taken to the Account Details page.
The top section tells them the most important information: Total amount due, Number of days past due, Last payment, Next payment date
The payment options are framed around how much the user can pay that month.
Depending on what they select they will be prompted to pay that amount or are taken to additional steps to set up a payment plan: reage, long-term forbearance, short-term forbearance, or settlement.
To learn more about what that payment option means the user can select the “details” button.
Users who are eligible for a payment program are prompted to complete a 3-step assessment of their hardships, income and debt.
A tailored payment program is formulated based on their answers.
Based on their questionnaire answers, users are presented with a payment program.
First, the plan is shown in an easy-to-scan format using human language.
Then the user needs to agree to the legal disclosure and accept the program to be enrolled.
Lastly, as a reminder, they are shown their program summary and are prompted to make their first payment.
Modals, banners and error messages were created to guide customers through the process of choosing a payment plan that works for them.
Each scenario was accounted for based on the options they selected and what they were currently qualified for.
Working with a group of SME’s with different backgrounds, we created a detailed Site Map. The flow of screens was determined by which options the user selects and whether they are qualified for various payment plans.
Getting detailed information from a range of sources was difficult. Each section of the flow went through many iterations as we helped the SME’s come to a common understanding and agreement.
The screens for each of the 7 Epics were presented and approved through 5 levels. Between each level, the screens would be refined based on the given feedback.
My confidence in presenting grew a lot during this process. Having different audiences for each review helped me learn how to frame my presentation in a clear way for that particular group.
For Epics 1-4, we created wireframes to define the UX flow & screen layouts. To make the review process quicker, we began building screens with our Hi-Fi components without the need for the wireframes since the visual design is very simple.
For this project, each page is designed for 4 breakpoints to ensure a great experience across various devices.
Once the designs were completed and approved for each of the 7 Epics, I uploaded the screens to Zeplin and created screen flow diagrams to handoff to the developers on the team. At the beginning of each development sprint I would walk the developers through each screen in the Epic and answer any questions.
Using Figma for this project would have made the design hand-off process smoother. At the time, I created the designs in Sketch and synced it with Zeplin with every update. Using Miro I imported pngs of the screens and created the screen flows.